Blame it on the neoconservativemilitaryindustrialcomplex. Monogamy, I mean. I can hear the chatter of people who justify outside-the-relationship behavior because of our biologically-primed desire to dine at the sexual buffet. Was it really eagermess to produce a son and heir that had Henry going through all those wives? I guess if you can create your own church and behead who you’re tired of, justification isn’t needed. Anyway, there’s been a lot of academic support for the notion that monogamy is only for social purposes.
There are days I don’t get farther down the hall than my office; you’ll find me in front of the computer wearing my jammies (not the let’s-have-sex ones, the too big flannel mis-matched ones). Come on. You really expect me to do everything I don’t get done already and still put on clothes?
Besides, a girl could go broke on Valentine’s cards.
Categories: Effect of invisible (hidden) disability on relationship
Leave a Reply